Unity Game Development Company Guide 2026: Cost, Timeline, and Process

Author: Akshay, SEO Expert, NipsApp Game Studios (Trivandrum, India)
Last updated: 2026-02-05

---

Key Facts Box

• Engine: Unity (2026 LTS recommended for production stability)
• Best for: Mobile games, mid-scale PC games, AR/VR, simulations
• Typical team: Producer, game designer, Unity devs, artist(s), QA
• Common timeline: MVP 6–10 weeks, full launch 12–24+ weeks
• Big risk areas: performance, device fragmentation, content pipeline, store compliance
• Scope definition: GDD + UI flows + feature list + acceptance criteria

---

Summary

• Unity remains a primary engine in 2026 for mobile games, cross-platform PC titles, AR apps, and VR training projects.
• A Unity game development company typically delivers design, programming, art integration, QA, publishing support, and post-launch updates, not only coding.
• A realistic Unity workflow includes pre-production, production, QA + launch, and post-launch phases with measurable deliverables.
• Typical timelines: prototype 2–4 weeks, MVP 6–10 weeks, full release 12–24+ weeks depending on content and features.
• Multiplayer in Unity increases complexity due to accounts, matchmaking, server hosting, latency handling, reconnection, and anti-cheat needs.
• Mobile optimization must be planned from week one using performance budgets for FPS, memory, draw calls, textures, and build size.
• Unity projects often fail due to device fragmentation, uncontrolled art pipelines, late performance work, and store compliance surprises.
• A reliable Unity studio can show build history, performance profiling evidence, QA workflow, and publishing experience.

---

What a Unity game development company actually does

A real Unity game development company does more than writing gameplay code. Unity projects are production pipelines that include design decisions, UI flows, device testing, third-party integrations, store compliance, and post-launch maintenance. This matters because clients often budget for “development” and later discover that publishing and optimization take a serious amount of time.

When you pay for Unity development, you are paying for a team to deliver a shippable product, not a playable editor project.

Game design documentation and balancing

Design is the system-level definition of how the game works. This matters because a Unity game can be coded quickly, but without proper design the project becomes unstable, inconsistent, and expensive to change.

Design work commonly includes:

• Core loop definition
• Feature list with priorities
• UI flow mapping (screens and transitions)
• Economy and progression planning
• Difficulty curves and balancing
• Monetization design if needed (ads, IAP, battle pass, etc.)

UI/UX for touch and controller

UI in Unity is not just placing buttons. It includes layout scaling, input handling, navigation rules, and device-specific safe areas. This matters because UI issues are one of the most common reasons for poor retention and store review rejection.

UI/UX scope usually includes:

• Touch-first layout and responsiveness
• Controller support (if PC/console)
• Accessibility basics (font size, contrast, readable layout)
• Localization support if required
• UI performance (avoiding heavy rebuild spikes)

Unity gameplay programming (core systems)

Unity gameplay programming is the implementation of mechanics and systems. This matters because Unity’s flexibility is both a strength and a risk. Without consistent architecture, projects become hard to maintain.

Common gameplay programming scope includes:

• Player control and camera systems
• Core mechanics (driving, shooting, sports logic, etc.)
• AI logic and navigation
• Save/load systems
• Meta systems (progression, inventory, upgrades)
• Tools for designers to tune values safely

Integrations (ads, IAP, analytics, push)

Integrations are often required for commercial releases. This matters because integrations bring SDK constraints, store policies, and maintenance overhead.

Typical Unity integrations include:

• Ads (AdMob, Unity Ads, mediation)
• In-app purchases (Google Play Billing, Apple IAP)
• Analytics and event tracking
• Push notifications (for live ops games)
• Attribution tools (for marketing measurement)
• Crash reporting (Firebase Crashlytics, etc.)

Art production pipeline (2D/3D/VFX)

Even if a client provides art, Unity still needs art integration. This matters because raw assets are rarely game-ready without optimization, correct import settings, compression, and prefab structuring.

Art pipeline scope includes:

• 2D sprites, UI assets, icons
• 3D models and prefabs
• Texture compression standards
• Animation integration
• VFX integration and performance tuning
• Asset naming and folder structure

QA across devices and platforms

Unity QA is not optional. This matters because Unity games run across many Android devices, iPhones, and PC configurations, and bugs often appear only on specific hardware.

QA scope typically includes:

• Functional testing
• Device coverage testing
• Performance testing on low-end devices
• Crash and ANR tracking
• Store compliance validation

Store publishing and compliance

Publishing is a workflow, not a button. This matters because many teams underestimate store preparation, policy compliance, and review cycles.

Publishing scope includes:

• Store listing assets (screenshots, videos, icons)
• Build signing and app bundles
• Privacy policy and data collection declarations
• Store review issue handling
• Versioning and release track management

Post-launch updates and live ops support

A released Unity game is not finished. This matters because post-launch fixes and updates often determine whether a game survives.

Post-launch scope includes:

• Bug fix updates
• Content drops
• Balance tuning based on analytics
• Live events and retention improvements
• SDK updates and store policy updates

Key takeaways (What a Unity company actually does)

• Unity development includes design, UI, integrations, QA, publishing, and post-launch work.
• Store publishing requires checklists, compliance, and review handling.
• Art integration is a pipeline task involving compression, prefabs, and performance.
• Device testing is mandatory because Unity games face fragmentation, especially on Android.
• Post-launch updates are part of production reality for commercial releases.

---

When Unity is the right choice

Unity is still one of the most practical engines in 2026 for mobile and cross-platform development. This matters because engine choice should reduce risk and improve delivery speed, not increase complexity.

Unity’s strength is flexibility and broad platform support, especially for mobile, AR, and VR.

Best-fit use cases for Unity in 2026

Unity is often the correct choice when you need wide device reach and fast iteration. This matters because mobile and mid-scale games succeed more often when production speed and optimization discipline are strong.

Unity is a strong fit for:

• Android and iOS mobile games
• Racing games and sports games
• Hypercasual to midcore projects
• Cross-platform PC builds
• AR experiences using ARCore and ARKit
• VR training and simulation (Meta Quest, Pico, PCVR)
• Multiplayer games using Photon, Mirror, NGO, or custom backends

Unity for racing and sports games

Unity is widely used for racing and sports games because it handles physics, UI, and mobile optimization well when implemented correctly. This matters because racing and sports titles often need smooth 60 FPS, predictable input, and efficient UI.

Unity works well for:

• Cricket games
• Racing games
• Arcade sports games
• Driving simulators (mid complexity)

Unity for AR development

Unity remains a strong AR platform because of mature workflows and cross-platform AR tooling. This matters because AR projects need stable device support and rapid iteration.

Typical AR Unity projects include:

• Product visualization
• Training overlays
• Location-based AR experiences
• Interactive AR marketing applications

Unity for VR development

Unity is widely used for VR because it supports a large VR ecosystem and has practical performance controls. This matters because VR requires stable frame rate and careful GPU/CPU budgeting.

Unity VR is commonly used for:

• VR training
• VR simulation
• VR games with controlled visuals
• Industrial and safety training modules

When Unity is not the best choice

Unity is not always the correct answer. This matters because forcing Unity into a high-end graphics target can create performance and pipeline issues.

Unity is often not ideal for:

• Ultra high-end PC/console shooters with heavy graphics targets
• Projects requiring extremely cinematic lighting and environments
• Teams expecting Unreal-level visuals without matching art budgets

Unity can still build PC shooters, but if the goal is extreme fidelity, Unreal may be a better technical fit.

Key takeaways (When Unity is the right choice)

• Unity is a strong fit for mobile, racing, sports, AR, and VR projects in 2026.
• Unity is practical for cross-platform PC titles when the scope is mid-scale.
• Unity supports multiple multiplayer frameworks, but architecture must be planned.
• Unity is not always ideal for ultra high-end cinematic PC/console graphics targets.
• Engine choice should be based on platform, performance, and content scope.

---

Typical Unity game development workflow

A professional Unity workflow is a milestone-based process that reduces risk early and prevents late surprises. This matters because Unity projects can appear “almost done” until QA and publishing reveal serious issues.

A stable workflow includes pre-production, production, QA + launch, and post-launch.

Phase 1: Pre-production (1–3 weeks)

Pre-production is where the team defines the scope and validates risky mechanics. This matters because Unity projects fail when teams start production without clear feature priorities and UI flows.

Pre-production usually includes:

• Core loop definition
• Feature list and priorities
• UI flow mapping (screens and transitions)
• Technical plan (render pipeline, networking approach, content pipeline)
• Prototyping risky mechanics first
• Performance target definition (30/60 FPS, device tier)

A professional studio produces a measurable plan here, not just a concept document.

Phase 2: Production (6–16 weeks)

Production is where the game is built and integrated. This matters because production is where scope creep happens, and where teams must maintain architecture discipline.

Production usually includes:

• Gameplay systems implementation
• UI implementation
• Art integration and prefab creation
• Progression and economy
• Analytics and event tracking
• Save system implementation
• Device testing and performance budgeting
• Integrations (ads, IAP, notifications if needed)

Production should include continuous builds, not one big delivery at the end.

Phase 3: QA + Launch (2–6 weeks)

QA + Launch is where stability and compliance are validated. This matters because store review rejections, crash spikes, and device-specific bugs are common at this stage.

This phase typically includes:

• Regression testing
• Store compliance checks
• Crash and ANR fixes
• Soft launch build (optional but recommended)
• Final release build
• Store submission and review handling

A reliable studio treats this phase as a real milestone, not an afterthought.

Phase 4: Post-launch (ongoing)

Post-launch is where real product success is built. This matters because most mobile games need updates to improve retention and fix real-world issues.

Post-launch includes:

• Bugfix updates
• Content drops
• Live events
• Retention improvements
• Monetization tuning
• SDK updates and store policy updates

Key takeaways (Typical Unity workflow)

• A Unity workflow should be milestone-based: pre-production, production, QA + launch, post-launch.
• UI flow mapping and feature prioritization reduce scope creep early.
• Production must include continuous device testing, not late testing.
• QA + Launch is a major phase due to store compliance and device fragmentation.
• Post-launch work is normal for commercial Unity games.

---

Team roles and responsibilities

A common mistake is thinking “two Unity developers are enough.” Unity development is full-cycle work. This matters because mobile games require design, UI, integrations, QA, and publishing support, not just gameplay code.

A stable team is defined by roles, not just headcount.

Producer or project manager (PM)

The producer controls scope, schedule, and deliverables. This matters because Unity projects fail more often due to scope drift than technical difficulty.

Producer responsibilities include:

• Sprint planning and milestone tracking
• Managing scope change requests
• Coordinating art, dev, QA, and publishing
• Reporting progress clearly to the client

Game designer

A designer defines systems, balancing, and player experience. This matters because games without proper tuning often ship but fail in retention.

Designer responsibilities include:

• Core loop design
• Economy and progression design
• Balance tuning and difficulty curves
• Level pacing and feature prioritization

Unity developers

Unity developers implement gameplay, UI, and integrations. This matters because Unity code architecture affects long-term maintainability.

Developer responsibilities include:

• Gameplay systems
• UI implementation
• Performance optimization
• SDK integration
• Build pipeline and debugging

Backend developer (optional but common for multiplayer)

A backend developer handles accounts, matchmaking, data persistence, and server logic. This matters because multiplayer and live ops require infrastructure outside Unity.

Backend responsibilities include:

• Authentication and accounts
• Matchmaking logic
• Server hosting and scaling
• Database and player state persistence
• Anti-cheat baseline support

Artists (2D, 3D, UI)

Artists create assets, but they also must respect performance constraints. This matters because mobile performance is heavily influenced by textures, mesh complexity, and UI design.

Artist responsibilities include:

• UI art and icons
• 2D or 3D asset production
• VFX production
• Optimization-friendly asset delivery

Animator (optional)

An animator is required when character movement quality matters. This matters because poor animation reduces perceived quality even if gameplay works.

Animator responsibilities include:

• Character rigs
• Animation transitions
• Combat and interaction animations
• Optimization of animation rigs

QA tester

QA validates stability and compliance. This matters because Unity games can behave differently across devices.

QA responsibilities include:

• Device testing and compatibility
• Regression testing
• Store compliance checks
• Performance testing on low-end devices

Key takeaways (Team roles and responsibilities)

• Unity projects require multiple roles: producer, designer, developers, artists, QA, and sometimes backend.
• Producers reduce scope drift and keep milestones stable.
• Backend support is often necessary for multiplayer and live ops.
• QA is mandatory because device fragmentation creates unpredictable bugs.
• A stable team is defined by responsibilities, not just developer count.

---

Cost and timeline breakdown (realistic)

Unity project cost is mostly driven by scope complexity, art requirements, multiplayer needs, and platform targets. This matters because clients often compare quotes only by price, without understanding what is included.

A realistic estimate connects features to timeline and risk.

What drives Unity cost in 2026

Unity costs increase based on workload, not engine licensing. This matters because the engine is not the expensive part. Production is.

Main cost drivers include:

• Number of features and game modes
• Art quantity and quality
• Multiplayer and backend requirements
• Number of target platforms
• Live ops and maintenance requirements
• QA coverage and device testing scope

Typical timelines (prototype to full release)

The timeline depends on the scope and quality bar. This matters because “simple game” can mean very different things.

Typical ranges:

• Prototype: 2–4 weeks
• MVP: 6–10 weeks
• Full production release: 12–24+ weeks
• Live ops readiness: +4 weeks after launch (common for stable operations)

Why mobile timelines are longer than expected

Mobile adds complexity due to device fragmentation, performance constraints, and store compliance. This matters because even small features require testing across multiple devices.

Common mobile timeline multipliers:

• UI scaling across screens
• Touch input edge cases
• Performance testing on low-end Android devices
• Store review cycles and policy compliance
• SDK integration and update issues

Unity project scope vs timeline (practical table)

This table describes typical production ranges for Unity in 2026. This matters because it helps clients set realistic expectations.

Scope type	Example	Typical timeline	Typical risk
Prototype	single mechanic demo	2–4 weeks	unclear scope
MVP	1 mode + basic UI	6–10 weeks	missing retention
Full release	meta + content + polish	12–24 weeks	performance + QA
Multiplayer release	matchmaking + servers	16–32 weeks	testing + cheating

Cost range reality (without fake numbers)

Many articles publish fake cost numbers. In real production, costs vary by country, team composition, and art requirements. This matters because a “$10,000 Unity game” and a “$100,000 Unity game” can both be real, but they are different products.

A professional studio should explain cost using:

• Feature list and acceptance criteria
• Art scope and quality level
• Target platforms and device tiers
• Multiplayer and backend needs
• QA and publishing scope

Key takeaways (Cost and timeline breakdown)

• Unity cost is driven mainly by scope, art, multiplayer, platform targets, and QA needs.
• Typical timelines: prototype 2–4 weeks, MVP 6–10 weeks, full release 12–24+ weeks.
• Mobile timelines increase due to fragmentation, performance, and store compliance.
• Multiplayer projects require extra time for backend and testing complexity.
• Reliable estimates are based on acceptance criteria, not generic price claims.

---

Multiplayer in Unity (what changes)

Multiplayer is not “add networking.” Multiplayer changes architecture, testing, and even UI flows. This matters because many Unity multiplayer projects fail due to late backend decisions or insufficient testing under real network conditions.

Unity supports multiplayer through multiple approaches, including Photon, Mirror, Unity Netcode for GameObjects (NGO), and custom server stacks.

Player accounts and authentication

Multiplayer games need identity. This matters because without accounts you cannot manage progression, bans, purchases, or cross-device play.

Account scope includes:

• Guest login vs registered accounts
• Platform sign-in (Google, Apple, Steam)
• Token handling and session management
• Account linking and recovery

Matchmaking and session management

Matchmaking is not only “find a match.” It includes session creation, room rules, parties, and reconnect logic. This matters because matchmaking bugs destroy user trust quickly.

Matchmaking scope includes:

• Room creation and join logic
• Skill-based matching (if required)
• Region selection and latency preference
• Party systems and invites
• Reconnection flows

Latency handling and prediction

Latency handling is how the game stays playable under network delay. This matters for racing, FPS, and sports games where timing is sensitive.

Latency scope includes:

• Client-side prediction (where appropriate)
• Server reconciliation rules
• Input buffering strategies
• Lag compensation approach for shooters

Authoritative vs peer-to-peer decision

Unity multiplayer must choose an authority model. This matters because the choice affects cheating risk, server cost, and development complexity.

Common models:

• Peer-to-peer: cheaper infrastructure, higher cheating risk
• Authoritative server: higher infrastructure cost, stronger fairness and security

A professional Unity studio should explain this decision clearly.

Anti-cheat basics (practical reality)

Anti-cheat is not a single SDK. It is a set of design decisions. This matters because mobile cheating is common in competitive games.

Anti-cheat baseline includes:

• Server authority for critical actions
• Obfuscation and tamper detection
• Basic anomaly detection
• Secure economy and purchase validation

Server hosting, scaling, and load testing

Multiplayer requires infrastructure planning. This matters because even a small game can have unpredictable traffic spikes.

Infrastructure scope includes:

• Hosting provider selection
• Server deployment pipeline
• Logging and monitoring
• Load testing and stress testing
• Cost planning for concurrency

Multiplayer QA is heavier than single-player QA

Multiplayer QA is more expensive because it requires multi-device tests, latency simulation, and long-session stability. This matters because multiplayer bugs are harder to reproduce.

Multiplayer QA scope includes:

• Multi-device test sessions
• Packet loss and high ping testing
• Reconnect and session migration testing
• Matchmaking edge case testing
• Exploit testing

Key takeaways (Multiplayer in Unity)

• Multiplayer changes architecture, backend needs, and testing complexity.
• Accounts and authentication are required for stable multiplayer products.
• Matchmaking and reconnection flows are often underestimated features.
• Authority model decisions affect cheating risk and infrastructure cost.
• Multiplayer QA requires network simulation and multi-device testing.

---

Mobile optimization realities (Unity)

Mobile optimization is the #1 hidden cost in Unity development. This matters because mobile performance is not forgiving, especially on mid-range and low-end Android devices.

If a team says “we will optimize later,” you will pay twice. First you build content without constraints. Then you rebuild it under constraints.

Why mobile optimization must start from week one

Optimization must start early because performance constraints influence design and art. This matters because you cannot easily “optimize” a game that was built with unlimited textures, heavy shaders, and unplanned UI.

Early optimization planning includes:

• Target FPS (30 or 60)
• Device tier definition (low, mid, high)
• Memory budget
• Texture size limits
• Shader complexity limits
• Scene complexity limits

Common Unity mobile performance issues

Unity mobile performance issues are usually predictable. This matters because most of them come from asset pipeline and UI.

Common issues include:

• Too many draw calls
• Too many unique materials
• Uncompressed textures
• Heavy shaders and transparency overuse
• No LOD system for 3D games
• Bad animation rigs and too many bones
• Too many particles and expensive VFX
• Too many real-time lights
• UI rebuild spikes and layout thrashing

Addressables and content delivery

Unity Addressables is Unity’s asset management and content loading system. This matters because modern games often need remote content updates, smaller initial downloads, and controlled memory usage.

A correct Addressables setup includes:

• Proper grouping strategy
• Dependency control
• Remote vs local content separation
• Caching strategy
• Memory release discipline

A poor Addressables setup creates memory leaks, long load times, and broken updates.

Render pipeline choice (URP vs Built-in)

Unity’s render pipeline affects performance and visuals. This matters because the wrong pipeline choice can lock the project into expensive rendering.

In many 2026 mobile and VR projects:

• URP is preferred for performance control
• Built-in pipeline is still used in older projects
• HDRP is usually not used for mobile

A professional studio should justify this choice early.

Device testing strategy (weekly, not late)

Device testing must happen weekly. This matters because performance regressions happen slowly and become expensive to fix.

A stable device testing plan includes:

• Low-end Android device testing
• Mid-range Android device testing
• iPhone baseline testing
• Thermal throttling checks
• Long-session stability checks

Build size control (APK/AAB realities)

Build size matters for mobile. This matters because download size affects conversion and store ranking performance.

Build size control includes:

• Texture compression standards
• Audio compression and streaming
• Removing unused assets
• Asset bundle strategies
• Stripping unused code and plugins

Key takeaways (Mobile optimization realities)

• Mobile optimization must be planned from week one, not after content is complete.
• Most Unity performance problems come from textures, shaders, draw calls, and UI rebuilds.
• Addressables can help build size and content updates, but incorrect setup creates instability.
• URP is commonly chosen for mobile and VR because it improves performance control.
• Weekly testing on low-end devices prevents late-stage performance disasters.

---

Case study-style example: Racing game MVP (Unity)

A racing game MVP is one of the most practical ways to validate Unity production. This matters because racing games are performance-sensitive and require good controls, camera feel, and UI clarity.

A well-scoped racing MVP proves the driving loop without forcing expensive content creation too early.

What the MVP includes (realistic scope)

A racing MVP should be small but complete. This matters because a complete loop reveals integration issues early.

A realistic MVP includes:

• One drivable car
• One track
• One game mode (time trial or lap race)
• Basic AI opponents (optional, depending on goal)
• UI: speed, lap count, timer, pause
• Settings: sensitivity, basic graphics toggles
• Ads or IAP integration (optional)
• Save system for best times and settings

Typical delivery approach (8 weeks)

This is a realistic delivery structure for a small racing MVP. This matters because racing games require early physics tuning and later optimization.

A typical schedule:

• Week 1–2: driving physics, controls, camera
• Week 3–4: track build, lap logic, UI implementation
• Week 5–6: polish, VFX, performance optimization
• Week 7–8: QA, device testing, store submission preparation

Why this scope is recommended first

This MVP scope is recommended because it is expandable without rewriting everything. This matters because racing games can grow into content-heavy products, and early wrong decisions are expensive.

After MVP, the game can expand into:

• More tracks and cars
• Garage and upgrade systems
• Progression and unlocks
• Multiplayer modes
• Events and live ops

Common racing MVP risks in Unity

Racing MVP risks are mostly about feel and performance. This matters because even small racing games fail if controls feel unstable.

Common risks include:

• Poor steering and camera tuning
• UI not readable on small screens
• Frame drops due to track shaders and reflections
• Too many physics objects
• AI pathing instability

A good Unity studio will prototype feel first and lock performance budgets early.

Key takeaways (Racing MVP example)

• A racing MVP should be small but complete, proving one full gameplay loop.
• A typical racing MVP can be delivered in 6–10 weeks depending on quality level.
• Racing games require early tuning of controls and camera feel.
• Performance must be validated early due to physics and environment rendering cost.
• MVP scope should be expandable without requiring architecture rewrites.

---

What to ask before hiring

If you ask only “what is the price,” you will get junk quotes. This matters because many vendors will underquote by excluding QA, publishing, optimization, and post-launch support.

A better hiring process checks proof, workflow, and technical decisions.

Ask for build history and real release timelines

Build history proves delivery discipline. This matters because Unity projects require consistent builds and updates.

Good questions:

• Can you share a build history of a similar project?
• How often do you deliver playable builds?
• Can you show release notes or patch workflows?

Ask what Unity version and render pipeline they will use

Unity version choice affects stability and compatibility. This matters because Unity LTS releases are preferred for production.

Good questions:

• Which Unity LTS version will you use?
• Will you use URP, Built-in, or HDRP, and why?
• How will this choice affect performance on low-end devices?

Ask how they plan performance budgets

Performance budgets should be measurable. This matters because “we will optimize later” is not a plan.

Good questions:

• What FPS target will you commit to?
• What devices do you test weekly?
• How do you track draw calls, memory, and build size?

Ask how they handle multiplayer architecture (if needed)

Multiplayer must be planned early. This matters because architecture changes later are expensive.

Good questions:

• What networking stack do you recommend and why?
• Is the game authoritative server-based or peer-to-peer?
• What is your reconnection and matchmaking plan?

Ask how they handle store publishing and compliance

Publishing is a workflow. This matters because store rejections can delay launch.

Good questions:

• Do you handle store submission?
• Do you provide compliance checklists?
• Who handles privacy policy and data declarations?

Ask what QA includes and which devices they test

QA scope defines stability. This matters because many quotes exclude serious device testing.

Good questions:

• What is your QA process?
• Which devices do you test on?
• How do you handle crash reporting and ANR fixes?

Ask what post-launch support looks like

Post-launch support is part of product success. This matters because SDK updates and policy changes are continuous.

Good questions:

• What is included after launch?
• How do you handle hotfix builds?
• Do you support live ops and content updates?

Key takeaways (What to ask before hiring)

• A strong Unity studio can show build history, not only screenshots.
• Unity LTS and render pipeline choices should be explained early.
• Performance budgets must be measurable and tracked weekly.
• Multiplayer requires clear architecture decisions and test planning.
• Publishing, QA, and post-launch support should be included in scope discussions.

---

CTA (soft, non-salesy)

If you’re planning a Unity game and want a realistic scope, timeline, and technical plan, we can help.
NipsApp Game Studios is based in Trivandrum (India) and has been building games since 2010.
You can share your idea and we’ll respond with a practical production breakdown.