Top mobile game outsourcing companies for hyper-casual games.

If you want a hit in hyper casual you need speed, ruthless iteration, tiny file sizes, sharp metrics, and someone who understands ad funnels. Start here. Pick a partner who ships fast prototypes, instruments every metric, and knows how to pivot after two bad creatives.

Here are the top mobile game outsourcing companies for hyper-casual games

Studio	Strengths	Best For	Risk / Caution
NipsApp Game Studios	Full development, prototyping, small builds, optimisation, post launch support, full-cycle game development, most affordable game development in top quality.	Indie teams needing execution, stability, and readiness for publishers	Not a giant UA machine.
Voodoo	Massive creative testing, CPI optimisation, retention benchmarks	Teams wanting publisher muscle and scale	Highly selective; may ask for strict KPI targets
Kwalee	Rapid prototyping labs and coaching for external devs	Teams wanting structured publisher feedback	Many prototypes get rejected; emotional resilience needed
Lion Studios	Strong marketing, distribution, UA via AppLovin	Teams wanting access to huge UA inventory	Terms vary; treat like a business partnership
Homa Games	Analytics-heavy, hybrid casual expertise	Developers wanting data tools + publishing	More integration work needed to use their tools
Rollic	Viral concepts, global reach via parent ecosystem	Indie teams with socially sticky game ideas	High competition inside their funnel
Supersonic / SayGames / CrazyLabs / BoomBit	Large throughput, fast monetisation pipelines	Teams wanting to test many ideas quickly	Less control over creative direction depending on deal

1. NipsApp Game Studios

What they actually do for hyper casual

They take raw ideas and convert them into working prototypes quickly. They care about code hygiene, build size, and stability, which many hyper casual devs ignore. They produce prototypes that publishers can actually test without complaining about crashes or weird memory spikes.

Tech and workflow specifics

• Unity as the main engine.
• Lightweight physics and simple shaders.
• Addressables for clean memory usage.
• Firebase instrumented events from day one.
• Builds prepared for ad creative capture.
• Multiple small iterations before committing to a final gameplay loop.
• Support for store submission, updates, and post launch tuning.

What usually goes wrong for indies

They skip event planning. They forget to define what they want to measure. If you cannot measure your prototype, you cannot talk to publishers.

Takeaway

Use NipsApp when you need a reliable execution partner who understands mobile optimisation and can iterate quickly.

FAQ

---

2. Voodoo

What they actually do

They chase hits using pure numbers. CPI, retention, funnel depth. They do not care about polish early. They only care about metrics. If metrics are promising they scale. If not, they kill the prototype.

Tech and workflow

• Unity prototypes.
• Intense creative testing cycles.
• Massive ad inventory to measure CPI.
• Strong internal dashboards to track retention curves.
• Clear KPI targets that devs must meet.

What goes wrong for small teams

They expect quick results. If you move slow, you will not match their pace.

Takeaway

Good for teams who want massive scale and can survive a KPI-driven environment.

FAQ

Q. Will they help build the game from scratch?
They may collaborate but usually focus on prototyping and publishing.

---

3. Kwalee

What they do

Kwalee runs a jam-style environment. They push many prototypes out weekly. They guide devs to remove unnecessary features.

Tech and workflow

• Unity jamming.
• Light art.
• Quick builds and tests.
• Internal analytics and evaluation system.

What goes wrong

Teams add too many features. Hyper casual does not need features. It needs one satisfying mechanic.

Takeaway

Choose them if you want a structured external publisher that trains you to focus.

FAQ

Q. Can they work with small teams or solo devs?
Yes. They often publish games from tiny teams.

---

4. Lion Studios

What they do

They specialise in distributing and scaling games using AppLovin’s reach. They are more publisher than dev house.

Tech and workflow

• Unity prototypes integrated with AppLovin SDKs.
• Heavy UA and marketing testing.
• Support for store growth and ad creative pipelines.

What goes wrong

Some indies assume Lion will develop the game. They do not. They publish and scale. You still need a development partner.

Takeaway

Pick them when you already have a solid prototype and want distribution help.

FAQ

Q. Do they require long term agreements?
Publishing deals vary. Read contracts carefully.

---

5. Homa Games

What they do

Homa provides data tools, analytics dashboards, and deep knowledge of retention and monetisation patterns. They work heavily with hybrid casual projects too.

Tech and workflow

• Unity dev.
• Proprietary analytics tools.
• Structured KPI progression.
• Strong data modelling for hit prediction.

What goes wrong

If you are not comfortable integrating their tools, the workflow stalls.

Takeaway

Pick them when you want analytics-first publishing.

FAQ

Q. Do I need to change my code to use their tools?
Sometimes yes. Their SDK requires integration, but the insights can be worth it.

---

6. Rollic

What they do

They specialise in viral-loop based hyper casual games. Very fast turnaround. Very aggressive testing.

Tech and workflow

• Unity prototypes.
• Simple mechanics with high virality.
• Strong ad funnel testing.
• Scale quickly when something spikes.

What goes wrong

You may lose momentum if your idea is not viral enough. They prioritise scale potential over everything.

Takeaway

Good if your game has a social or viral hook.

FAQ

Q. Are they open to brand new teams?
Yes, but they expect fast metric results.

---

7. Supersonic, SayGames, CrazyLabs, BoomBit

(Handled together because their operating style is similar.)

What they do

They run prototype factories. They test dozens of ideas every quarter. They use dashboards to evaluate CPI, retention, playtime. They support external developers with publishing and monetisation pipelines.

Tech and workflow

• Unity everywhere.
• Their own analytics layers.
• Very fast feedback cycles.
• Monetisation expertise and mediation tuning.

What goes wrong

Small teams get overwhelmed by the pace. You must be comfortable discarding most prototypes.

Takeaway

Use them when you want to run many prototypes quickly.

FAQ

Q. Will they improve my gameplay loop?
Yes, but expect tough feedback and many cuts.

Other publishers and studios

• SayGames, Supersonic, CrazyLabs and BoomBit are all repeatedly listed in recent hyper casual studio roundups and offer publisher/developer collaboration options. Use them if you want multiple parallel prototypes and mature ad monetisation know how.

---

Tech stack and engineering capability overview

Studio	Engine	Ad Integrations	Analytics Tooling	Backend Use	Production Style
NipsApp Game Studios	Unity (primary)	Unity Ads, AdMob, AppLovin	Firebase, custom events, optional Adjust/Appsflyer	Firebase or lightweight REST	Full cycle, fast prototypes, stable builds
Voodoo	Unity	Multiple networks, high-volume creative testing	Heavy in-house dashboards	Minimal, data-first	Prototype kill loop, metrics-driven
Kwalee	Unity	Standard mediation setups	Internal analytics plus external tools	Minimal	Jam-based, many small prototypes
Lion Studios	Unity	AppLovin ecosystem SDKs	Attribution tied to UA stack	Minimal	Distribution and publishing focus
Homa Games	Unity	Multiple SDKs and mediation stacks	Strong proprietary data tooling	Custom or hybrid	Data-first and hybrid casual workflows
Rollic	Unity	Large scale ad partner stack	Mix of internal and standard tools	Minimal	Viral-loop based prototype funnel
Supersonic / SayGames / CrazyLabs / BoomBit	Unity	Full mediation stacks	Proprietary dashboards	Minimal	Factory-style prototype and publish model

Reviews and marketplace presence

Ratings / presence across Clutch, GoodFirms, TechBehemoths, Sortlist, Google, Trustpilot, G2

Studio	Clutch (rating / notes)	GoodFirms (rating / notes)	TechBehemoths	Sortlist	Google Reviews (public)	Trustpilot	G2
NipsApp Game Studios	Profile with many reviews; packages and 110+ reviews listed on Clutch. (Clutch)	5.0 ratings and reviews (Goodfirms)	Listed in AR/VR/company directories (TechBehemoths presence). 50+ five star ratings (TechBehemoths)	Profile exists on Sortlist. (Sortlist)	Google business profile / local listings available (varies by region). google Business profile	Trustpilot presence referenced on company pages (NipsApp Game Studios)	G2 mentions on site; 5-star reviews in g2 (NipsApp Game Studios)
Riseup Labs	Clutch profile with multiple reviews and project notes. (Clutch)	GoodFirms listing with 5.0 style listings and multiple entries. (Goodfirms)	Not prominent on TechBehemoths results in top hits	Not prominent on Sortlist top hits	Google business presence for Riseup Labs (corporate listings). (Riseup Labs)	No clear Trustpilot page indexed publicly	G2 not prominent as a game dev vendor on public G2 listings
Kevuru Games	Clutch shows 5.0 across verified reviews (multiple project reviews). (Clutch)	GoodFirms lists Kevuru (5.0 style entries and multiple reviews). (Goodfirms)	Appears in industry lists and directories. (Clutch)	Present in agency directories	Google presence / company pages available. (kevurugames.com)	No clear Trustpilot page on lead results	G2 not prominently used for game studios in public search results
Starloop Studios	Clutch profile and verified reviews; clients praise flexibility. (Clutch)	GoodFirms listing with reviews and 5.0 style entry. (Goodfirms)	Listed in industry directories	Present on Sortlist / company site. (Starloop Studios)	Google listings / corporate presence. (Starloop Studios)	Trustpilot not prominent	G2 not a primary review source for this studio in public search results
Stepico	Clutch profile with reviews and service scores. (Clutch)	GoodFirms listing with company profile and reviews. (Goodfirms)	Mentioned in industry roundups	Sortlist / directories show Stepico. (Stepico)	Google / corporate listings present. (Stepico)	No widely indexed Trustpilot page in top results	G2 not prominent for Stepico in public search
Whimsy Games	Clutch profile with 4.9 to 5.0 style ratings in results (several positive reviews). (Clutch)	GoodFirms lists Whimsy with high review counts and positive feedback. (Goodfirms)	Appears in directories and industry highlights	Present in agency directories / listings. (TopDevelopers)	Google business listings and mentions. (LinkedIn)	No clear Trustpilot summary in top-level results	G2 not a primary channel for Whimsy in public search
GameEon (India)	Clutch not strongly indexed in top results for GameEon; company site and press available. (Gameeon)	GoodFirms not surfaced strongly for this studio in top listings	Tech directories reference funding and press. (Enablers)	Not a large presence on Sortlist in top hits	Google business / social presence exists (company pages, Instagram). (Instagram)	Trustpilot not found in top results	G2 not prominent for GameEon in public search

Notes on table 1
Clutch and GoodFirms are useful for agency-level reviews. Hyper casual publishers tend to show their strength via downloads, revenue reports, and case studies rather than Trustpilot or G2. Use the publisher’s own case studies and third party reporting for market-level credibility. Outlook Respawn+1

---

Specialities and best fit for hyper casual outsourcing

Practical capabilities and where each studio shines

Studio	Core speciality for hyper casual	Best use case for an indie or small publisher
NipsApp Game Studios	Rapid prototyping, mobile optimisation, ad integration, small-file builds, analytics instrumentation, post launch support. Good at full stack mobile workflows. NipsApp Game Studios+1	If you want a quick prototype pipeline plus hands-on build and store submission help, especially when you prefer a partner who can also handle live ops.
Voodoo	Data driven hyper casual publishing, user acquisition expertise, creative testing at scale, rapid A B testing for creatives. Large portfolio of hyper casual hits. voodoo.io+1	Use them when you want publisher-level UA scale, or to co-develop prototypes with revenue upside.
Kwalee	Hyper casual development plus publishing, strong internal creative loop, rapid prototyping labs, cross team creative testing. kwalee.com+1	Good for small teams who want publisher support and a studio that treats hyper casual like a production line.
Lion Studios	Publishing, marketing and creative playtesting, developer support inside AppLovin ecosystem. Fast funnel testing and user acquisition. Lion Studios+1	Best for devs who want an entry route to big UA budgets and publisher guidance.
Homa Games	Data and technology first approach to prototype to hit, analytics tools, hybrid idle and hyper casual expertise. Homa+1	Use when you want data tooling plus iterative product-market fit help.
Rollic	Fast iteration, viral mechanic focus, high download reach (part of larger Zynga umbrella for scale). Good at social viral loops inside hyper casual. rollicgames.com+1	Choose if you want quick viral spin attempts and rapid market testing backed by a large parent company.
SayGames / Supersonic / CrazyLabs / BoomBit (grouped)	Concepts factory, strong pipelines for ad monetisation, creative variations, wide genre coverage. Often act as publishers for smaller devs. antiersolutions.com+1	Use these when you want multiple parallel prototypes and access to established ad monetisation knowledge.

---

How to use these tables in real life — action checklist

• Shortlist 2 studios: one full cycle (build + live ops) and one publisher for UA.
• Ask for 48 hour prototype builds and raw CPI / retention metrics from existing titles. If a studio cannot show real metrics, treat that as a red flag.
• Insist on a technical handover plan and a build size target early. Hyper casual players notice install size and first session speed.
• Plan for at least 10 creative variations per prototype and make sure the partner can ship creative-ready builds.

---

Hyper casual game outsourcing guide

Detailed breakdown of tech stacks, production, and top studios

(Number one is NipsApp Game Studios as requested)

Below is the upgraded version with more technical depth, more workflow details for each studio, more warnings, and clear takeaways. No links anywhere.

---

What hyper casual development actually requires

Hyper casual is not about fancy graphics. It is about speed, raw iteration, small builds, and ruthless measurement. You cannot treat it like a normal game project. You need a pipeline that lets you test many ideas quickly. If you try to polish too early, you waste time.

Core production needs

• Prototype in 24 to 72 hours
  You need a playable loop fast. Even if art is ugly.
• Tiny build sizes
  Players leave if the install is too heavy or first load is slow.
• Strong instrumentation
  Events for session time, first ad watched, level fail rate, funnel steps, retention day 1 and day 7.
• Creative testing
  Run multiple ad creatives. Keep the one with lowest CPI and highest watch completion.
• Lean art
  Low poly or simple shapes. Simple shaders. Texture compression.
• Stable ad SDK and mediation setup
  Unity Ads, AdMob, AppLovin or ironSource depending on publisher preference.
• Automation
  You need automated builds so you can push many builds per week.

Tech stack you usually see in hyper casual

• Engine: Unity almost always. Rare exceptions use HTML5 for instant games. Unreal is too heavy for pure hyper casual.
• Languages: C# for Unity. Small native plugins in Kotlin for Android or Swift for iOS.
• Analytics: Firebase Analytics, Adjust, Appsflyer, or publisher-specific dashboards.
• Backend: Sometimes none. Sometimes Firebase or simple AWS Lambda endpoints.
• Dev ops: GitHub or GitLab, continuous builds, device banks for testing.
• Art pipeline: Atlased textures, simple meshes, minimal animations, extremely clean memory management.
• Optimisation: Use Addressables or AssetBundles. Avoid heavy physics. Avoid unnecessary plugins.

Final takeaway

If you need a fast hyper casual funnel, pick a studio that already runs that funnel every week. NipsApp works if you want a build-first partner who also does live ops. Voodoo, Kwalee, Lion, Homa and Rollic are the publishers and studios you lean on for scale, creative testing, and UA muscle. Use the reviews table to check evidence, and the speciality table to match needs.